Go Beavers!
If a small baseball program can build a championship team, then
perhaps there are lessons of hope for US table tennis.
The 2007 College World Series Champion was—
the Oregon State Beavers? I’m a sports fan, and
since the Beavers do hail from Oregon State University,
my father’s alma mater located a hundred
miles outside of my hometown, it was only natural
that I followed their run. The hype was great in
2006 when the orange-and-black clad Beavers took
the college baseball world by surprise, winning Oregon
State’s first ever baseball national championship.
This year, when Oregon State, a team that was
supposed to be in a rebuilding year, was selected as
the 64th team out of the 64 that are allowed into the
NCAA Regional Bracket Tournament, and subsequently
qualified by for the College World Series
by winning their region, Beaver fans were more
than pleased. But when the Beavers continued their
outstanding play, never even having had to rely on
the double elimination format of the CWS by going
undefeated, we were ecstatic. No one knew about
Beaver baseball just years before, but as back-toback
national champions, Oregon State may now
rightly be feared.
This is a table tennis magazine, and my boasting
about the Beavers of Oregon State is not to draw
attention to my crowned interest of the month of
June, but because their victory really got me thinking
about my primary interest of the last ten years—
our sport— and I hope it will shed some light of
optimism for you, the reader who would one day
like to see American table tennis be rightly feared,
too. I say this because I found myself asking the
same question after watching the Beavers celebrate
the last pitch thrown to seal the championship as I
do when I evaluate the state of our sport in my role
as an athlete in the system and as a member of the
USATT Board; that is: What does it take for the
underdog— the one with an outside chance if there
even is one, the competitor that has to face stronger
and more established opponents— to win?
For table tennis in the U.S., the answer is not so
simple as to follow the model of the world’s best
table tennis nations, China for instance, because
some aspects of their systems are not feasible in
ours. But to me, there is still no reason why we
should leave behind hope for the future of American
table tennis even in light of the difficulties that
it faces, as other programs are challenged too, but
find concrete ways to break through the limits of
what was thought to be conceivable. I view the
challenges that the Oregon State baseball program
initially faced to be relatively similar to ours, and it
comforts me in a way. I’ll elaborate:
The US Team competes against the world’s best,
Asian superpowers like China and Korea and the
long-standing programs that are set up in Germany
and elsewhere. Oregon State University competes
in the Pac-10 conference in NCAA college sports,
but its athletic program is no real match for others
within the conference, which includes Arizona and
USC. Thinking in the context of OSU’s baseball
program, national powerhouses hail from larger
and more successful athletic programs, which are
also traditionally hot-weather teams, the likes of
Louisiana State and Texas. And because of Oregon
State’s lack of prestige, the Beavers cannot match
the recruiting power of their rivals. They also face a
shorter season due to the stubborn Oregon weather,
opening their season by playing away games to
avoid the rain. Oregon State baseball does not have
the most money, the best facilities, or even the most
talented group in the nation, and yet they continue
to win. Likewise, USA Table Tennis will never be
able to get the governmental support that other nations
receive; our talent pool is smaller, and our
program is not as established, and so the everlasting
question posed earlier beckons. I don’t know
the exact answer for American table tennis, but it
is something I am helping to work on, and I do so
because I still believe in our potential, especially
after watching Oregon State solve the same question,
and prove the success of their methods not
once, but twice, in the consecutive national championships
that the Beavers now hold.
And how did Oregon State do it? They started by
hiring and supporting the right coach, Pat Casey,
who began the transformation of an existing baseball
team into the nation’s best. Casey played
minor league ball before beginning his coaching
career at a small college in Oregon before taking
over the Oregon State baseball team in 1995. The
program has progressed in steps, from battling to a
winning record to gaining a national ranking to being
the College World Series champion. Casey has
since been recognized for his work through the two
Coach of the Year awards he has received.
I like to think that American table tennis has a
Pat Casey within our ranks. If we freeze our current
coaching situation and compare it to the past,
the number and level of capable coaches may be
unprecedented. Our men’s national team coach,
Danny Seemiller, achieved one of the highest
ever world ranking for an American born player,
and Doru Gheorghe recently guided our women’s
national team members to claim titles in both the
team and singles event at the Pan American Championships.
Also working with our players in the
U.S. are former world champions Stellan Bengtsson,
Zhang and Zhenshi Li; Emilia Gheorghe and
Fan Yiyong, coaches for our younger national
teams; Sean O’Neill, responsible for the US Paralympic
Team; and also those who lead successful
junior programs— Stefan Feth and Dennis Davis
in the Bay Area, Cheng Yinghua and Jack Huang in
Maryland, and others around the country. If coaching
is an area we are not lacking in, then what is
needed? Perhaps more support coming from the
association to help unify the efforts of these coaches,
just as Oregon State backed coach Casey in a
ten-year contract and renovation of Oregon State’s
baseball stadium.
Pat Casey has never complained, as far as I’ve
read, about being a coach at Oregon
State and the hardships that
may come with it; instead, he
took what he had and believed in
its potential. Because Corvallis,
the small college so-called “cowtown”
is not exactly high on the
wish list of most of America’s
top baseball talent, Casey and his
coaching staff turned to recruiting
primarily in-state kids, players
who are often overlooked by
bigger programs. That Casey
was able to build the Oregon
State program around good, but
not always great, talent is a testament
to both his coaching and to
his players, as they continue to turn good talent into
great play, which is all that matters.
When I evaluate the talent of some of America’s
best young players, I see no reason to think
solemnly. The selection pool is smaller than most
everywhere else and is something that must be
worked on, but the talent is good, and good can
be turned into great. Although the Beavers have a
core group of Oregon-grown players, the team also
must rely on kids who grew up playing elsewhere.
Similarly, our U.S. Team is made better by athletes
who contribute their energy and effort in playing
for our country after careers abroad, and as such,
we should be thankful for players like Gao Jun and
others who raise the level of our potential. They
are the best addition to supplement the players who
learned table tennis here in America.
While respectable coaching and strong players
are critical components to reaching athletic success,
they are nothing without a burning desire to
do so. From watching and reading about the Beavers
all June, there was no mistake that the want
to win among the team was what led them to their
national championship. To compare the body language
found in the dugouts between OSU and their
respective opponents during the CWS was to almost
instinctively know the winner. We need this
passion and commitment for our sport to excel in
the United States, and it must come from the leaders
of our association, from our coaches, from our
players, and from our members. I witnessed it now
growing among our women’s team when Tawny
Banh e-mailed me immediately after her gold
medal win in the team event at the Pan Ams about
how cool and exciting the whole thing was, and I
hope that the momentum and passion will continue
to carry through the Beijing Olympic Games next
summer.
In the end, I would like nothing more than to be
able to match our U.S. National table tennis team’s
achievements with that of what the Beavers have
accomplished. There are many pieces that fall in
between that guided Oregon State to overcome the
obstacles that it faced, pieces that we still have to
unravel and resolve in our own sport, but this article
is not to serve as road map for how we can
play catch up. Rather, it is to share the renewed
hope that I found with you that the possibility for
substantial success is real.
|